BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of BPD on T2DM in BMI >35 kg/m(2) patients are far better than those in patients with BMI 25-35. This study was aimed at investigating if a similar difference exists between patients with mild obesity (OB, BMI 30-35) or simple overweight (OW, BMI 25-30). METHODS: Fifteen OB (six M) and 15 OW (13 M), diabetic for ≥ 3 years, with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% despite medical therapy, underwent BPD. OB/OW: age 55.1 ± 8.0/57.8 ± 6.7 years, BMI 33.1 ± 1.5/28.0 ± 1.3 kg/m(2), diabetes duration 11.6 ± 8.0/11.1 ± 6.1 years, insulin therapy 4/8 p. FSG and HbA1c were determined preoperatively and up to 2 years. Insulin resistance and beta-cell function were explored by means of HOMA-IR and IVGTT (AIR). Thirty-eight diabetic patients on medical therapy served as controls. RESULTS: Mean BMI stabilized around 27 since the 4th month in OB, and 24 since 1st month in OW. FSG in OB/OW preop, 1, 12, 24 months: 234 ± 76/206 ± 62 mg/dL, 154 ± 49/176 ± 75, 131 ± 32/167 ± 48, 134 ± 41/154 ± 41 (cross-sectional n.s. at all times); HbA1c: 9.5 ± 1.6/9.1 ± 1.3, 7.3 ± 1.1/7.3 ± 1.2, 5.9 ± 0.6/7.1 ± 1.1 (p < 0.01), 5.9 ± 0.9/6.9 ± 1.1 (p < 0.01). HOMA-IR, preoperatively 10.7 ± 5.8/7.5 ± 5.4, went below 3.0 at 1 month and remained such until 2 years in both groups. AIR, preoperatively 1.11 ± 3.17/1.27 ± 2.68 μIU/mL, in OB significantly increased at 4 months to 7.63 ± 5.79, maintained up to 2 years with 6.95 ± 3.19, whereas in OW, statistical significance was reached only at 2 years with 5.02 ± 4.87. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly different BPD effect, thus biological severity of T2DM, also exists between mildly obese and simply overweight patients. The rise of AIR allows hoping that an increase of beta-cell mass may occur in the long run.

The Effects of Biliopancreatic Diversion on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Patients with Mild Obesity (BMI 30-35 kg/m2) and Simple Overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m 2) A Prospective Controlled Study.

SCOPINARO, NICOLA;ADAMI, GIOVANNI;PAPADIA, FRANCESCO SAVERIO;CAMERINI, GIOVANNI;ANDRAGHETTI, GABRIELLA;CORDERA, RENZO
2011-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of BPD on T2DM in BMI >35 kg/m(2) patients are far better than those in patients with BMI 25-35. This study was aimed at investigating if a similar difference exists between patients with mild obesity (OB, BMI 30-35) or simple overweight (OW, BMI 25-30). METHODS: Fifteen OB (six M) and 15 OW (13 M), diabetic for ≥ 3 years, with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% despite medical therapy, underwent BPD. OB/OW: age 55.1 ± 8.0/57.8 ± 6.7 years, BMI 33.1 ± 1.5/28.0 ± 1.3 kg/m(2), diabetes duration 11.6 ± 8.0/11.1 ± 6.1 years, insulin therapy 4/8 p. FSG and HbA1c were determined preoperatively and up to 2 years. Insulin resistance and beta-cell function were explored by means of HOMA-IR and IVGTT (AIR). Thirty-eight diabetic patients on medical therapy served as controls. RESULTS: Mean BMI stabilized around 27 since the 4th month in OB, and 24 since 1st month in OW. FSG in OB/OW preop, 1, 12, 24 months: 234 ± 76/206 ± 62 mg/dL, 154 ± 49/176 ± 75, 131 ± 32/167 ± 48, 134 ± 41/154 ± 41 (cross-sectional n.s. at all times); HbA1c: 9.5 ± 1.6/9.1 ± 1.3, 7.3 ± 1.1/7.3 ± 1.2, 5.9 ± 0.6/7.1 ± 1.1 (p < 0.01), 5.9 ± 0.9/6.9 ± 1.1 (p < 0.01). HOMA-IR, preoperatively 10.7 ± 5.8/7.5 ± 5.4, went below 3.0 at 1 month and remained such until 2 years in both groups. AIR, preoperatively 1.11 ± 3.17/1.27 ± 2.68 μIU/mL, in OB significantly increased at 4 months to 7.63 ± 5.79, maintained up to 2 years with 6.95 ± 3.19, whereas in OW, statistical significance was reached only at 2 years with 5.02 ± 4.87. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly different BPD effect, thus biological severity of T2DM, also exists between mildly obese and simply overweight patients. The rise of AIR allows hoping that an increase of beta-cell mass may occur in the long run.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/392777
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 16
  • Scopus 71
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 65
social impact