A judgment of the Supreme Court gave the opportunity to think about the right of the heirs of the party injured by a medical malpractice (who died of different cause before the trial was defined) to get from the injurer the sum liquidated from the court on the basis of the costs of surgery and medical treatments needed to recover from the malpractice suffered. The paper argues that the Court used the recovery costs as liquidation criteria and the fact that the injured person cannot be cured anymore does not cancel the right of the injured party (and of his heirs if the party died before the final judgment) to get compensation for what was lost due to the bad treatment done by the injurer.
TRASMISSIBILITà IURE HEREDITATIS DEL RISARCIMENTO PER INTERVENTI EMENDATIVI
SAVORANI, GIOVANNA
2003-01-01
Abstract
A judgment of the Supreme Court gave the opportunity to think about the right of the heirs of the party injured by a medical malpractice (who died of different cause before the trial was defined) to get from the injurer the sum liquidated from the court on the basis of the costs of surgery and medical treatments needed to recover from the malpractice suffered. The paper argues that the Court used the recovery costs as liquidation criteria and the fact that the injured person cannot be cured anymore does not cancel the right of the injured party (and of his heirs if the party died before the final judgment) to get compensation for what was lost due to the bad treatment done by the injurer.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
