Background/Objectives: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm predominantly diagnosed in older adults. However, the significance of defining patient frailty, as well as identifying the most suitable and reliable tools for its assessment, remains to be firmly established. Methods: This retrospective observational study investigated 36 patients aged 65 or older who underwent Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). The average patient age was 76 (SD 6.22), with 33.3% being female. Patients were evaluated using the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index (IMWG-FI) and the 40-item Rockwood’s Frailty Index (FI) at the Oncogeriatrics clinic of the IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy between December 2017 and August 2021. Laboratory, cancer-specific, demographic, and clinical variables were collected. Survival analysis and frailty comparison were conducted using Stata version 17.0. Results: Stepwise multivariate analysis identified the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.09–1.78, p = 0.008) and Rockwood’s Frailty Index (FI) (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.29–3.87, p = 0.004) as significant prognostic predictors, adjusted for sex, ISS stage, and multimorbility. Comparison between Rockwood’s FI and IMWG-FI using Spearman correlation coefficient showed no statistically significant correlation (r = 0.268, p = 0.114). Multivariate Cox model, adjusting for sex, International Staging System (ISS) stage, and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) comorbidity index demonstrated the superior predictive ability of Rockwood’s FI over IMWG-FI (C-index 0.775 vs. 0.749). Conclusions: The 40-item Rockwood FI emerges as a valuable tool for prognostication in old MM patients, demonstrating non-inferiority to the traditional IMWG-FI in predictive accuracy, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive approach considering both disease-specific and patient-related factors.

Prognostic Frailty-Based Determinants of Long-Term Mortality in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Mariya Muzyka;Silvia Ottaviani;Irene Caffa;Tommaso Bonfiglio;Erica Parisi;Ana Isabel GUIJARRO ANTON;Luca Tagliafico;Roberto Massimo Lemoli;Marta Ponzano;Cristina Marelli;Alessio Signori;Alessio Nencioni;MICHELE CEA;FIAMMETTA MONACELLI
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm predominantly diagnosed in older adults. However, the significance of defining patient frailty, as well as identifying the most suitable and reliable tools for its assessment, remains to be firmly established. Methods: This retrospective observational study investigated 36 patients aged 65 or older who underwent Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). The average patient age was 76 (SD 6.22), with 33.3% being female. Patients were evaluated using the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index (IMWG-FI) and the 40-item Rockwood’s Frailty Index (FI) at the Oncogeriatrics clinic of the IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy between December 2017 and August 2021. Laboratory, cancer-specific, demographic, and clinical variables were collected. Survival analysis and frailty comparison were conducted using Stata version 17.0. Results: Stepwise multivariate analysis identified the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.09–1.78, p = 0.008) and Rockwood’s Frailty Index (FI) (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.29–3.87, p = 0.004) as significant prognostic predictors, adjusted for sex, ISS stage, and multimorbility. Comparison between Rockwood’s FI and IMWG-FI using Spearman correlation coefficient showed no statistically significant correlation (r = 0.268, p = 0.114). Multivariate Cox model, adjusting for sex, International Staging System (ISS) stage, and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) comorbidity index demonstrated the superior predictive ability of Rockwood’s FI over IMWG-FI (C-index 0.775 vs. 0.749). Conclusions: The 40-item Rockwood FI emerges as a valuable tool for prognostication in old MM patients, demonstrating non-inferiority to the traditional IMWG-FI in predictive accuracy, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive approach considering both disease-specific and patient-related factors.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1242917
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact