Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: comparing in-office and operating room treatments

Objective. We report the management of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) employing a protocol that includes both office-based (OB) and general anaesthesia (GA) procedures. Quality of life (QoL) outcomes in the OB cohort were compared to those obtained from an historical cohort treated only under GA. Methods. Patients affected by RRP from 2019 until 2023 (“new protocol”) and from 2012 to 2019 (“historical protocol”) were enrolled. In both groups the Derkay site score (DSS) was calculated. In patients adhering to the new protocol, questionnaires measuring QoL were prospectively administered (voice handicap hindex-10 [VHI-10] along with a specific questionnaire to measure the tolerance to the OB procedures). A cost analysis was also performed. Results. In all, 35 patients composed the new protocol cohort and 13 the historical. In the first group, patients underwent a median of 4 treatments. At 2 years, 68% of patients were treated ex clusively in the office. Overall, for the new protocol, median DSS and VHI-10 after one year were both significantly lower than those at baseline [2 vs 4 and 3 vs 14, respectively; p < 0.001]. No differences were found between the new and the historical protocol cohorts considering DSS over time. Conclusions. Treatment of RRP may be conducted successfully in an office-based setting reducing healthcare costs.