The essay examines the ruling no. 65/2024 of the Constitutional Court, highlighting some critical issues surrounding the theoretical foundation of the so-called self- government of parliamentary bodies. In particular, the work briefly highlights the problematic consequences of an obiter dictum that concludes the ruling and that, by separating regulatory autonomy from self-government, ends up comprimising an adequate functional characterization of the regulatory reserve provided by art. 64 of the Constitution.
Ancora un problematico obiter dictum della Corte in tema di autodichia (brevi notazioni a margine di Corte cost., sent. n. 65 del 2024)
Michele Francaviglia
2024-01-01
Abstract
The essay examines the ruling no. 65/2024 of the Constitutional Court, highlighting some critical issues surrounding the theoretical foundation of the so-called self- government of parliamentary bodies. In particular, the work briefly highlights the problematic consequences of an obiter dictum that concludes the ruling and that, by separating regulatory autonomy from self-government, ends up comprimising an adequate functional characterization of the regulatory reserve provided by art. 64 of the Constitution.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.